<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TV &#38; Not TV &#187; Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvnottv.com/tag/comedians-in-cars-getting-coffee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvnottv.com</link>
	<description>Jason Lynch brings you everything you need to know about television — and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 04:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Why Crackle, Sony’s Big Digital Video Play, was Sidelined for ‘The Interview’</title>
		<link>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/crackle-sonys-big-digital-video-play-sidelined-interview/</link>
		<comments>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/crackle-sonys-big-digital-video-play-sidelined-interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 18:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Lynch]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crackle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Berger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Interview]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnottv.com/?p=1033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For my first story of 2015, I looked at one of the biggest head-scratchers in The Interview’s strange saga: why Sony dropped the ball on the chance to boost the profile of its own streaming site, Crackle. As I wrote at Quartz, Yet despite a New York Post report on December 21st that Sony was [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/crackle-sonys-big-digital-video-play-sidelined-interview/">Why Crackle, Sony’s Big Digital Video Play, was Sidelined for ‘The Interview’</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://qz.com/320489/why-crackle-sonys-big-digital-video-play-was-sidelined-for-the-interview/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1034" src="http://tvnottv.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/interview-crackle.jpg" alt="interview crackle" width="940" height="529" /></a></p>
<p>For my first story of 2015, I looked at one of the biggest head-scratchers in <em>The Interview</em>’s strange saga: why Sony dropped the ball on the chance to boost the profile of its own streaming site, Crackle. <a href="http://qz.com/320489/why-crackle-sonys-big-digital-video-play-was-sidelined-for-the-interview/" target="_blank">As I wrote at <em>Quartz</em></a>,</p>
<blockquote><p>Yet despite a <a href="http://nypost.com/2014/12/21/sony-plans-to-release-the-interview-on-crackle-for-free/">New York Post report</a> on December 21st that Sony was going to stream <em>The Interview</em> on Crackle, a studio source tells Quartz that Crackle was not considered as part of <em>The Interview</em>’s digital strategy, given that the free site has no mechanism in place for charging consumers the $5.99 rental and $14.99 purchase fee for the film that the other VOD outlets have been offering.</p></blockquote>
<p>Still, this is a major missed opportunity for Crackle, which has been trying to lure new viewers with several new original films and series (though only one, Jerry Seinfeld’s <em>Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee</em>, seems to have any real traction).</p>
<p>This would <em>seem</em> to be the last <em>Interview</em> story I’ll do for awhile, but never say never…</p>
<p><a href="http://qz.com/320489/why-crackle-sonys-big-digital-video-play-was-sidelined-for-the-interview/" target="_blank">Why Crackle, Sony’s big digital video play, was sidelined for ‘The Interview’</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fcrackle-sonys-big-digital-video-play-sidelined-interview%2F&amp;linkname=Why%20Crackle%2C%20Sony%E2%80%99s%20Big%20Digital%20Video%20Play%2C%20was%20Sidelined%20for%20%E2%80%98The%20Interview%E2%80%99" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fcrackle-sonys-big-digital-video-play-sidelined-interview%2F&amp;linkname=Why%20Crackle%2C%20Sony%E2%80%99s%20Big%20Digital%20Video%20Play%2C%20was%20Sidelined%20for%20%E2%80%98The%20Interview%E2%80%99" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/crackle-sonys-big-digital-video-play-sidelined-interview/">Why Crackle, Sony’s Big Digital Video Play, was Sidelined for ‘The Interview’</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/crackle-sonys-big-digital-video-play-sidelined-interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One of the Most Buzzed-About Super Bowl Ads Wasn’t Actually an Ad</title>
		<link>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/one-buzzed-super-bowl-ads-wasnt-actually-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/one-buzzed-super-bowl-ads-wasnt-actually-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Lynch]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crackle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Seinfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seinfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnottv.com/?p=634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, everyone was talking about the Seinfeld reunion that aired during the Super Bowl. As I wrote at Quartz, While social media immediately began buzzing about the spot, which Seinfeld put together with the help of Seinfeld co-creator Larry David, it wasn’t actually a Super Bowl ad. Neither Seinfeld nor Sony, which owns Crackle, paid [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/one-buzzed-super-bowl-ads-wasnt-actually-ad/">One of the Most Buzzed-About Super Bowl Ads Wasn’t Actually an Ad</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://qz.com/173149/one-of-the-most-buzzed-about-super-bowl-ads-wasnt-actually-an-ad/"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-635" src="http://tvnottv.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/one-of-the-most-buzzed-about-300x168.png" alt="one of the most buzzed about" width="300" height="168" /></a></p>
<p>Yesterday, everyone was talking about the <em>Seinfeld</em> reunion that aired during the Super Bowl. <a href="http://qz.com/173149/one-of-the-most-buzzed-about-super-bowl-ads-wasnt-actually-an-ad/" target="_blank">As I wrote at <em>Quartz</em></a>,</p>
<blockquote><p>While social media immediately began buzzing about the spot, which Seinfeld put together with the help of <em>Seinfeld</em> co-creator Larry David, it wasn’t actually a Super Bowl ad. Neither Seinfeld nor Sony, which owns Crackle, paid FOX any money for the segment, according to The New York Times. Instead, FOX reached out to Seinfeld and asked him to put together a feature segment to help the network kick off its halftime coverage.</p></blockquote>
<p>A longer version of the reunion ran as part of <em>Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee</em>, Jerry Seinfeld’s web series for Crackle.</p>
<p><a href="http://qz.com/173149/one-of-the-most-buzzed-about-super-bowl-ads-wasnt-actually-an-ad/" target="_blank">One of the most buzzed-about Super Bowl ads wasn’t actually an ad</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fone-buzzed-super-bowl-ads-wasnt-actually-ad%2F&amp;linkname=One%20of%20the%20Most%20Buzzed-About%20Super%20Bowl%20Ads%20Wasn%E2%80%99t%20Actually%20an%20Ad" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fone-buzzed-super-bowl-ads-wasnt-actually-ad%2F&amp;linkname=One%20of%20the%20Most%20Buzzed-About%20Super%20Bowl%20Ads%20Wasn%E2%80%99t%20Actually%20an%20Ad" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/one-buzzed-super-bowl-ads-wasnt-actually-ad/">One of the Most Buzzed-About Super Bowl Ads Wasn’t Actually an Ad</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/one-buzzed-super-bowl-ads-wasnt-actually-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
