<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TV &#38; Not TV &#187; USA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvnottv.com/tag/usa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvnottv.com</link>
	<description>Jason Lynch brings you everything you need to know about television — and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 04:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>From USA to Bravo, NBCUniversal&#8217;s Cable Channels are in Transition</title>
		<link>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/usa-bravo-nbcuniversals-cable-channels-transition/</link>
		<comments>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/usa-bravo-nbcuniversals-cable-channels-transition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Lynch]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bravo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris McCumber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Olde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jill Kargman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie Rottenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odd Mom Out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharknado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharknado 2: The Second One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syfy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnottv.com/?p=1112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>NBC is building momentum among broadcast networks, but parent NBCUniversal’s cable networks are in transition, with USA regrouping after giving up on last year’s comedy push and Bravo and E! venturing into scripted series for the first time. All three networks made the case for their respective new directions at winter press tour, as I [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/usa-bravo-nbcuniversals-cable-channels-transition/">From USA to Bravo, NBCUniversal&#8217;s Cable Channels are in Transition</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/television/usa-bravo-nbcuniversals-cable-channels-are-transition-162408"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1113" src="http://tvnottv.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NBCU-TCA.jpg" alt="NBCU TCA" width="652" height="367" /></a></p>
<p>NBC is building momentum among broadcast networks, but parent NBCUniversal’s cable networks are in transition, with USA regrouping after giving up on last year’s comedy push and Bravo and E! venturing into scripted series for the first time. All three networks made the case for their respective new directions at winter press tour, <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/television/usa-bravo-nbcuniversals-cable-channels-are-transition-162408" target="_blank">as I wrote at <em>Adweek</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It&#8217;s about creating that next generation of hits for us,&#8221; USA president Chris McCumber told Adweek. He said the network is shifting away from comedy to focus on its strong drama development slate, including Dig (debuting March 5), Complications (summer), and its cyber-crime drama Mr. Robot, which McCumber is most enthusiastic about.</p>
<p>&#8220;We saw the dramas that were coming down the line, and we said, we feel so strongly about them, that we want to make sure we pick our shots,&#8221; McCumber said. &#8220;You can&#8217;t launch everything. And so you need to be able to say, we&#8217;re going to prioritize these.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the story for much more on Bravo and E!’s respective forays into scripted territory, with <em>Odd Mom Out</em> and <em>The Royals</em>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/television/usa-bravo-nbcuniversals-cable-channels-are-transition-162408" target="_blank">From USA to Bravo, NBCUniversal&#8217;s Cable Channels are in Transition</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fusa-bravo-nbcuniversals-cable-channels-transition%2F&amp;linkname=From%20USA%20to%20Bravo%2C%20NBCUniversal%E2%80%99s%20Cable%20Channels%20are%20in%20Transition" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fusa-bravo-nbcuniversals-cable-channels-transition%2F&amp;linkname=From%20USA%20to%20Bravo%2C%20NBCUniversal%E2%80%99s%20Cable%20Channels%20are%20in%20Transition" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/usa-bravo-nbcuniversals-cable-channels-transition/">From USA to Bravo, NBCUniversal&#8217;s Cable Channels are in Transition</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/usa-bravo-nbcuniversals-cable-channels-transition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which Networks Made the Naughty and Nice Lists This Year?</title>
		<link>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/networks-made-naughty-nice-lists-year/</link>
		<comments>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/networks-made-naughty-nice-lists-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 13:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Lynch]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FXX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnottv.com/?p=999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I’ve wrapped my Best (&#38; Worst) in 2014 week, but I have one final look back for this year: my Adweek story about which networks made Santa’s naughty and nice lists in 2014. The easiest call by far? NBC, which topped the nice list: It was a very good year for the Peacock Network, which [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/networks-made-naughty-nice-lists-year/">Which Networks Made the Naughty and Nice Lists This Year?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/television/which-networks-made-naughty-and-nice-lists-year-162042"><img class="aligncenter wp-image-1000 size-full" src="http://tvnottv.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/networks-naughty-nice.jpg" alt="networks naughty nice" width="652" height="367" /></a></p>
<p>I’ve wrapped my <a href="http://tvnottv.com/tag/best-of-2014/">Best (&amp; Worst) in 2014 week</a>, but I have one final look back for this year: <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/television/which-networks-made-naughty-and-nice-lists-year-162042">my <em>Adweek</em> story</a> about which networks made Santa’s naughty and nice lists in 2014. The easiest call by far? NBC, which topped the nice list:</p>
<blockquote><p>It was a very good year for the Peacock Network, which won the 2013-14 season in 18-49 (a 2.7 average), its first demo victory in 10 years. The network picked up where it left off this fall, where it&#8217;s once again leading the pack in 18-49 (thanks largely to Sunday Night Football and The Voice). Not even <a href="http://edit.adweek.com/news/television/nbcs-peter-pan-didnt-even-come-close-sound-music-161804">Peter Pan Live&#8217;s disappointing ratings</a> can stall NBC&#8217;s momentum, especially with Super Bowl XLIX waiting in the wings on Feb. 1.</p></blockquote>
<p>How did the rest of the networks fare? <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/television/which-networks-made-naughty-and-nice-lists-year-162042">Take a look!</a></p>
<p>And with that, TV &amp; Not TV will be taking a holiday hiatus for a few days (barring breaking news). But we’ll be back at the end of the week with news of an exciting TV appearance this weekend that should mark TV &amp; Not TV’s television debut.</p>
<p>Until then, happy holidays!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/television/which-networks-made-naughty-and-nice-lists-year-162042" target="_blank">Which Networks Made the Naughty and Nice Lists This Year?</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fnetworks-made-naughty-nice-lists-year%2F&amp;linkname=Which%20Networks%20Made%20the%20Naughty%20and%20Nice%20Lists%20This%20Year%3F" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fnetworks-made-naughty-nice-lists-year%2F&amp;linkname=Which%20Networks%20Made%20the%20Naughty%20and%20Nice%20Lists%20This%20Year%3F" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/networks-made-naughty-nice-lists-year/">Which Networks Made the Naughty and Nice Lists This Year?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/networks-made-naughty-nice-lists-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Netflix, HBO, Amazon, Showtime and the Rest of TV Need to Resolve to Do in 2015</title>
		<link>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/netflix-hbo-amazon-showtime-rest-tv-need-resolve-2015/</link>
		<comments>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/netflix-hbo-amazon-showtime-rest-tv-need-resolve-2015/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Lynch]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Nevins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO Go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Showtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony PlayStation Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnottv.com/?p=974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It seems like just yesterday that I had written five 2014 resolutions for the TV industry. But it’s already time to look ahead to 2015, which I did today for Quartz. (First, however, I took stock of how my 2014 resolutions turned out — not too shabby!) This year, instead of making resolutions for the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/netflix-hbo-amazon-showtime-rest-tv-need-resolve-2015/">What Netflix, HBO, Amazon, Showtime and the Rest of TV Need to Resolve to Do in 2015</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://qz.com/313768/what-netflix-hbo-amazon-showtime-and-the-rest-of-tv-need-to-resolve-to-do-in-2015/"><img class="aligncenter wp-image-975 size-full" src="http://tvnottv.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/2015-resolutions.jpg" alt="2015 resolutions" width="940" height="529" /></a></p>
<p>It seems like just yesterday that I had written <a href="http://qz.com/162366/five-ways-television-can-save-itself-in-2014/" target="_blank">five 2014 resolutions for the TV industry</a>. But it’s already time to <a href="http://qz.com/313768/what-netflix-hbo-amazon-showtime-and-the-rest-of-tv-need-to-resolve-to-do-in-2015/" target="_blank">look ahead to 2015</a>, which I did today for <em>Quartz</em>. (First, however, I took stock of how my 2014 resolutions turned out — not too shabby!)</p>
<p>This year, instead of making resolutions for the entire industry to follow, I created specific ones for the industry’s major players. For example, for Hulu:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hulu: Don’t get left in the dust by Netflix and Amazon</p>
<p>In 2014, Hulu made some big moves to try and stay in the race with Netflix and Amazon, including <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/14/business/media/hulu-to-stream-south-park-as-more-players-jostle-for-online-rights.html?_r=0">an $80 million-plus deal</a> acquiring the rights to all seasons of <em>South Park</em> and ordering three new series produced by the likes of J.J. Abrams, Jason Reitman and Amy Poehler. But those new shows, and <em>South Park</em>, need to deliver, and make Hulu a worthy streaming competitior. Oh, and Hulu, you know how you’ve been considering cutting back <a href="http://nypost.com/2014/10/08/hulu-ceo-mulls-cutting-number-of-ads-running-on-hulu-plus/">the number of ads running</a> on Hulu Plus? Do that. Immediately.</p></blockquote>
<p>I hope my 2015 resolutions fare as well as the 2014 ones did!</p>
<p><a href="http://qz.com/313768/what-netflix-hbo-amazon-showtime-and-the-rest-of-tv-need-to-resolve-to-do-in-2015/" target="_blank"> What Netflix, HBO, Amazon, Showtime and the rest of TV need to resolve to do in 2015</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fnetflix-hbo-amazon-showtime-rest-tv-need-resolve-2015%2F&amp;linkname=What%20Netflix%2C%20HBO%2C%20Amazon%2C%20Showtime%20and%20the%20Rest%20of%20TV%20Need%20to%20Resolve%20to%20Do%20in%202015" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fnetflix-hbo-amazon-showtime-rest-tv-need-resolve-2015%2F&amp;linkname=What%20Netflix%2C%20HBO%2C%20Amazon%2C%20Showtime%20and%20the%20Rest%20of%20TV%20Need%20to%20Resolve%20to%20Do%20in%202015" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/netflix-hbo-amazon-showtime-rest-tv-need-resolve-2015/">What Netflix, HBO, Amazon, Showtime and the Rest of TV Need to Resolve to Do in 2015</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/netflix-hbo-amazon-showtime-rest-tv-need-resolve-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cable Networks Will Save Themselves by Focusing on What They Do Best</title>
		<link>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/cable-networks-will-save-focusing-best/</link>
		<comments>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/cable-networks-will-save-focusing-best/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Lynch]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th and Loud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Better Call Saul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bravo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris McCumber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eliot Goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shaving the cord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Walking Dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnottv.com/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Just nine months ago, USA President Chris McCumber was talking to me about his network’s push into comedy, and preaching patience. Looks like his patience has worn thin, because USA announced that it is retreating from comedy and refocusing on drama, while AMC has pulled the plug on almost its entire reality slate as it, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/cable-networks-will-save-focusing-best/">Cable Networks Will Save Themselves by Focusing on What They Do Best</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://qz.com/280755/cable-networks-will-save-themselves-by-focusing-on-what-they-do-best/"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-767" src="http://tvnottv.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/cable-networks-will-save-themselves-300x168.jpg" alt="cable networks will save themselves" width="300" height="168" /></a></p>
<p>Just nine months ago, USA President Chris McCumber was talking to me about his network’s push into comedy, and preaching patience. Looks like his patience has worn thin, because USA announced that it is retreating from comedy and refocusing on drama, while AMC has pulled the plug on almost its entire reality slate as it, too, opts to concentrate on what it does best.<a href="http://qz.com/280755/cable-networks-will-save-themselves-by-focusing-on-what-they-do-best/" target="_blank"> As I explained at <em>Quartz</em></a>,</p>
<blockquote><p>Those surprising moves were in part explained by a Wall Street Journal report that the US top 40 most widely distributed cable channels in 2010—USA and AMC included—have lost an average of 3.2 million subscribers, or more than 3% of their distribution, during the last four years, as consumers have starting “shaving the cord” by opting for smaller, cheaper bundles of channels.</p>
<p>Intent on not being shaved out of existence, networks are refocusing on keeping their core audiences happy, rather than trying and attract new viewers. “In an environment of exploding content options for viewers,” AMC said in explaining its decision, “we have decided to make scripted programming our priority.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Both networks damaged their core business by taking their eye off the ball, and their sudden retrenching should also be a red flag for E! and Bravo, which are both branching into scripted series for the first time.</p>
<p><a href="http://qz.com/280755/cable-networks-will-save-themselves-by-focusing-on-what-they-do-best/" target="_blank">Cable networks will save themselves by focusing on what they do best </a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fcable-networks-will-save-focusing-best%2F&amp;linkname=Cable%20Networks%20Will%20Save%20Themselves%20by%20Focusing%20on%20What%20They%20Do%20Best" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fcable-networks-will-save-focusing-best%2F&amp;linkname=Cable%20Networks%20Will%20Save%20Themselves%20by%20Focusing%20on%20What%20They%20Do%20Best" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/cable-networks-will-save-focusing-best/">Cable Networks Will Save Themselves by Focusing on What They Do Best</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/cable-networks-will-save-focusing-best/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s Next for Leno? 7 Networks That Might Nab Him</title>
		<link>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/whats-next-for-leno-7-networks-that-might-nab-him/</link>
		<comments>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/whats-next-for-leno-7-networks-that-might-nab-him/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Lynch]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[late-night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Tonight Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnottv.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Jay Leno is signing off from The Tonight Show Thursday — for good this time, he swears — and he said he’s had “all kinds of offers” for his next TV job. He says he has nothing planned yet, but as I note at NBCNews.com: But a notorious workaholic like Leno — who squeezed in 100 stand-up [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/whats-next-for-leno-7-networks-that-might-nab-him/">What’s Next for Leno? 7 Networks That Might Nab Him</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/tv/whats-next-leno-7-networks-might-nab-him-n23046"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-66" src="http://tvnottv.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/today-leno-monologue-300x169.jpg" alt="today-leno-monologue" width="300" height="169" /></a></p>
<p>Jay Leno is signing off from <em>The Tonight Show</em> Thursday — for good this time, he swears — and he said he’s had “all kinds of offers” for his next TV job. He says he has nothing planned yet, but <a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/tv/whats-next-leno-7-networks-might-nab-him-n23046" target="_blank">as I note at NBCNews.com:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>But a notorious workaholic like Leno — who squeezed in 100 stand-up gigs last year in addition to his regular &#8216;&#8221;Tonight Show&#8221; hosting duties — won’t simply be putting his feet up in retirement.</p></blockquote>
<p>I suggest seven different networks that might be a good fit for him — and why.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/tv/whats-next-leno-7-networks-might-nab-him-n23046" target="_blank">What’s Next for Leno? 7 Networks That Might Nab Him</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fwhats-next-for-leno-7-networks-that-might-nab-him%2F&amp;linkname=What%E2%80%99s%20Next%20for%20Leno%3F%207%20Networks%20That%20Might%20Nab%20Him" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fwhats-next-for-leno-7-networks-that-might-nab-him%2F&amp;linkname=What%E2%80%99s%20Next%20for%20Leno%3F%207%20Networks%20That%20Might%20Nab%20Him" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/whats-next-for-leno-7-networks-that-might-nab-him/">What’s Next for Leno? 7 Networks That Might Nab Him</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/whats-next-for-leno-7-networks-that-might-nab-him/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Show Just Lowered the Median Age of USA Network Viewers by 12 Years</title>
		<link>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/show-just-lowered-median-age-usa-network-viewers-12-years/</link>
		<comments>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/show-just-lowered-median-age-usa-network-viewers-12-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 21:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Lynch]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News/Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris McCumber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnottv.com/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the interesting challenges of TCA winter tour has been searching for nuggets of news that would be most appealing to Quartz readers. I was at it again today with this story out of USA’s presentation, on how Modern Family has lowered the median age of its viewers by 12 years. As I wrote, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/show-just-lowered-median-age-usa-network-viewers-12-years/">This Show Just Lowered the Median Age of USA Network Viewers by 12 Years</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://qz.com/168504/usa-network-just-lowered-its-median-viewers-age-by-12-years/ "><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-626" src="http://tvnottv.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/this-show-just-lowered-300x168.jpg" alt="this show just lowered" width="300" height="168" /></a></p>
<p>One of the interesting challenges of TCA winter tour has been searching for nuggets of news that would be most appealing to <em>Quartz</em> readers. I was at it again today with this story out of USA’s presentation, on how <em>Modern Family</em> has lowered the median age of its viewers by 12 years. <a href="http://qz.com/168504/usa-network-just-lowered-its-median-viewers-age-by-12-years/ " target="_blank">As I wrote</a>,</p>
<blockquote><p>Those early statistics are encouraging for USA, which paid a reported $1.4 million per episode for the syndication rights to the show’s first four seasons, and launched the syndication run in September with a lavish marketing campaign usually reserved for original series. “When we brought Modern Family on, the whole idea was, how do we increase the reach of USA and bring new people into the fold?” USA Network President Chris McCumber told Quartz. “It’s already doing that and it’s only been on the air for a few months.”</p></blockquote>
<p>McCumber also talked with me about trying to use <em>Modern Family</em>’s success to help launch its upcoming comedies, like <em>Sirens</em>.</p>
<p><a href="http://qz.com/168504/usa-network-just-lowered-its-median-viewers-age-by-12-years/ " target="_blank">This show just lowered the median age of USA Network viewers by 12 years</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fshow-just-lowered-median-age-usa-network-viewers-12-years%2F&amp;linkname=This%20Show%20Just%20Lowered%20the%20Median%20Age%20of%20USA%20Network%20Viewers%20by%2012%20Years" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftvnottv.com%2Fnewsanalysis%2Fshow-just-lowered-median-age-usa-network-viewers-12-years%2F&amp;linkname=This%20Show%20Just%20Lowered%20the%20Median%20Age%20of%20USA%20Network%20Viewers%20by%2012%20Years" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/show-just-lowered-median-age-usa-network-viewers-12-years/">This Show Just Lowered the Median Age of USA Network Viewers by 12 Years</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tvnottv.com">TV &amp; Not TV</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvnottv.com/newsanalysis/show-just-lowered-median-age-usa-network-viewers-12-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
